Its high time again to describe ourselves anew at the backdrop of an AM seemingly sending it's listeners the intended feeling and meaning. Socratically, telling ourselves we don't know what an AM is, will make us examine our lives so that we can worthily live it, and thus we can know what an HM really is, we can know ourselves.
AM doesn't. It just seemingly.
A human being will, wether or not he/she is singing, send you the meaning and feeling.
Of course technology will evolve and will sound more human. But unless human session artists perform the AM song, then the actual sending of feeling and meaning will not be recaptured again. Why recapture? Because AM song is trained on HM. And we already said that we need to respect the source of its ability. Otherwise we would hate ourselves.
The brilliance of an AM song is "applaudible," and Alfred Nobel wants us to celebrate the right technology and its use. Nothing is inherently evil with AM in comparison with an atomic bomb. We just have to use AM technology correctly.
Right now though, we are still in the process of knowing what AM really is.
Someone who understands and feels can actually also communicate such complex meaning and feeling. It's just that a song was in my opinion the highest form of capturing for communication the feeling and meaning at the same time.
As a being-for-others, human beings create songs that are by nature designed to be heard by others or Other. Human beings always tend to attract his fellow human beings and form a communion, or to commune with God.
No comments:
Post a Comment